A fly on the wall at ‘The Body Farm’

I had really high hopes for The Body Farm, having loved Waking The Dead but, unfortunately, found so much to dislike in this cliched spin-off.

We opened with a voiceover from Eve Lockhart, who told the dead she wanted to ‘unlock the mechanism of your murder’ which was interspersed with a shot of an unrealistic body with a weed growing through it and the team eating their lunch mid-way through tampering with the inhabitants of the farm.

Credit: treehugger.com

A body farm, we found out, is where forensics experts experiment on people who’ve donated themselves as part of a scientific experiment, allowing forensic scientists to deduce how humans decompose in various settings and conditions.

Their first case was investigating the circumstances which led to two guys spattering themselves across a room in a condemned apartment building. So far, so disgusting. Having become accustomed to the gory side of forensic shows, it wasn’t this that caused face-contortion, but a scene where a half-naked Oggy, smeared in blood and effluent, chatted to his colleagues about bacteria in the name of science. We didn’t really understand why he had decided to cover himself in the (no doubt) stinking liquid. To be honest, we didn’t want to.

It’s a good thing this wasn’t filmed in 3D, because the flies, specially bred by the production team (according to Keith Allen on This Morning), were everywhere and they had a special starring role of their own which we’ll get to later.

After around ten minutes of watching, I wasn’t keen. The dialogue was unnatural and seemed very constructed to ensure you knew, for example, that Oggy suffered from some kind of illness; ‘a disorder’. It played into what American Dad has lampooned in terms of story telling – unnatural over-explanation of what a character is doing or thinking, or how two characters are related: “I didn’t know what to do, sis… what? I’ve never called you sis before? You’re right. It is oddly clunky and expositional. I mean, I know you’re my sister. Who am I saying it for? Weird”.

In fiction, writers are told to ‘show, not tell’, meaning that instead of a character saying ‘I’m really pretty annoyed right now’, they slam a car door or are extremely rude to someone for no reason. This was an exercise in telling.

The dialogue and suspension of belief required in believing that a cheating boyfriend would hammer two men into submission before blowing them up with knowledge gleaned from his girlfriend’s father’s war stories was nothing compared with the unrealistic technology available to the Home Office, unbelievably fast turnaround of a paternity test and the idea that anyone could stand in a room that had been decorated with someone’s insides, swarming with flies, without a mask.

Criminal Minds fans will also recognise a similarity between ‘quirky’ Oggy (who has to take pills, you know, did you notice that?) and Garcia, who stay behind in the office with a mass of computer screens, making ‘clever’ quips and observations whilst the team do the dirty work.

Gory artex aside, for me, the highest rating on the repulsive scale was when one of the scientists appeared to pregnancy test a rat. I wasn’t sure exactly what he was doing, but investigating the demise of the poor rodent would possibly have been more interesting.

Plot holes were also aplenty: how did they know the two boys were dead before they exploded? Why would the news of a girl in a coma being likely to die be broken by Rosa, a visiting pathologist, and not the doctor responsible for the comatose patient? Does GHB definitely show up in blood tests? Why was the father not surprised to learn he was under arrest? He was never cautioned. Would they really question a dead woman’s sister and father a few seconds after her death? How do you castrate a fly? I assume it was some kind of genetic or chemical castration or else surgery with a huge degree of magnification. Do forensic scientists really grind up tsetse flies after they’ve supped on the blood of the murdered?

This was, sadly, one of the most contrived stories I’ve seen, coupled with wooden acting, cold and unfeeling characters, overdramatic music and dodgy visual editing designed to get you to the edge of your seat. Sadly, I was supine, watching with disinterest in order to get to the end of this review.

Reviewed by Tannice for thecustardtv. Follow Tannice on Twitter.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “A fly on the wall at ‘The Body Farm’

  1. This over-long, confused and poorly written review serves only to prove that the proliferation of TV review sites on the Internet benefits no one other than the egos of those who write this weak stuff. Was The Body Farm any good? A curate's egg with potential and promise. Did I learn anything from this review? That the reviewer isn't quite up to the task. 3/10

  2. This over-long, confused and poorly written review serves only to prove that the proliferation of TV review sites on the Internet benefits no one other than the egos of those who write this weak stuff. Was The Body Farm any good? A curate's egg with potential and promise. Did I learn anything from this review? That the reviewer isn't quite up to the task. 3/10

  3. Thank you for your response. I'm sorry that you didn't enjoy what I have written. Thanks for awarding me 3 out of 10 though. Better than nothing.

    Perhaps next time you could post under your own name or engage on Twitter. I'd like to know what parts of it you thought were badly written, so that I may improve my output for the audience.

  4. Thank you for your response. I'm sorry that you didn't enjoy what I have written. Thanks for awarding me 3 out of 10 though. Better than nothing.

    Perhaps next time you could post under your own name or engage on Twitter. I'd like to know what parts of it you thought were badly written, so that I may improve my output for the audience.

  5. Crumbs, well I enjoyed reading this review anyway. I thought it was informative and funny in its own right and I honestly can't see how someone could be so negative about it. “Overlong and confused”? Did this anonymous commenter read the same review that I did? Baffling.

  6. Crumbs, well I enjoyed reading this review anyway. I thought it was informative and funny in its own right and I honestly can't see how someone could be so negative about it. “Overlong and confused”? Did this anonymous commenter read the same review that I did? Baffling.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s